Groundwater pollution:

While oil spills are highly visible and often get a lot of media attention, a much greater threat to human life comes from our groundwater being polluted which is used for drinking and irrigation. While groundwater is easy to deplete and pollute it gets renewed very slowly and hence must be used judiciously. Groundwater flows are slow and not turbulent hence the contaminants are not effectively diluted and dispersed as compared to surface water. Moreover pumping groundwater and treating it is very slow and costly. Hence it is extremely essential to prevent the pollution of groundwater in the first place. Ground water is polluted due to: • Urban run-off of untreated or poorly treated waste water and garbage • Industrial waste storage located above or near aquifers • Agricultural practices such as the application of large amounts of fertilizers and pesticides, animal feeding operations, etc. in the rural sector • Leakage from underground storage tanks containing gasoline and other hazardous substances • Leachate from landfills • Poorly designed and inadequately maintained septic tanks • Mining wastes Severe cases of arsenic poisoning from contaminated groundwater have been reported from West Bengal in what is known today as the worst case of groundwater pollution. The School of Environmental Sciences, Jadhavpur University, West Bengal has been involved in the task of surveying the magnitude of the arsenic problem in West Bengal for the last fourteen years. According to a report in the Down to Earth (Vol. 11, No.22), arsenic poisoning was first noticed by K C Saha, former professor of dermatology at the School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata when he began to receive patients with skin lesions that resembled the symptoms of leprosy which was in reality not leprosy. Since all the patients were from the district of 24-Parganas, Saha along with others began to look for the cause and found it to be arsenic toxicity. Thus groundwater arsenic contamination in West Bengal was first reported in a local daily newspaper in December 1983 when 63 people from three villages located in different districts were identified by health officials as suffering from arsenic poisoning. There are two theories that have been put forth to explain this unusually high content of arsenic in groundwater.

One group of researchers suggested that the cause is natural while the other stated that the cause is man-made. According to the first hypothesis, arsenic probably originates in the Himalayan headwaters of the Ganga and the Brahmaputra rivers and has been lying undisturbed beneath the surface of the region’s deltas for thousands of years in the thick layers of fine alluvial mud across the banks of these rivers. Most of the arsenic affected areas of West Bengal lie in the alluvial plains formed in the quarternary period (last 1.6 million years).The Purulia district of West Bengal is part of the extensive area of the Precambrian era (last 570 million year) having metamorphic rocks and granites with widespread sulphide mineralisation. Researchers from the UK based British Geological Survey (BGS) suggested that their position close to where the river Ganga enters Bangladesh (geologically) may be the primary source of arsenic in the Bengal alluvium. According to David Kinniburgh project leader with BGS the main factor is time. The mud in these areas is thicker, wider and flatter than almost anywhere else on earth. It can thus take hundreds or thousands of years for underground water to percolate through the mud before reaching the sea and thus it absorbs arsenic for a long period.

Other researchers feel that the excess amount of arsenic in groundwater can be contributed to by the high rate of groundwater extraction. Their hypothesis called the pyrite oxidation thesis describes how arsenic can get mobilized in the groundwater. In this hypothesis arsenic is assumed to be present in certain minerals (pyrites) that are deposited within the aquifer sediments. Due to the lowering of the water table below the deposits, arseno-pyrite which is oxidized in a zone of the aquifer called the Vadose zone releases arsenic as arsenic adsorbed on iron hydroxide. During the subsequent recharge period, iron hydroxide releases arsenic into groundwater. This theory is supported by two arguments. The first is the intensive irrigation development in West Bengal using deep tube wells and shallow tube wells. This method of extraction, which was exactly in the 20m to 100m below ground level ensured, increased contribution of groundwater to irrigation. The other argument that supports the pyrite oxidation theory is that prior to irrigation development and drinking water supply schemes based on groundwater there were no reported cases of arsenic poisoning.

Arsenicosis or arsenic toxicity develops after two to five years of exposure to arsenic contaminated drinking water depending on the amount of water consumption and the arsenic concentration in water. Initially the skin begins to darken (called diffuse melanosis) which later leads to spotted melanosis when darkened sports begin to appear on the chest, back and limbs. At a later stage leucomelanosis sets in and the body begins to show black and white spots. In the middle stage of arsenicosis the skin in parts becomes hard and fibrous. Rough, dry skin with nodules on hands or the soles of feet indicate severe toxicity. This can lead to the formation of gangrene and cancer. Arsenic poisoning brings with it other complications such as liver and spleen enlargement, cirrhosis of the liver, diabetes, goiter and skin cancers. The state of India’s rivers India has always had a tradition of worshipping rivers. Most of the rivers in India are named after gods, goddesses or saints. However a large majority of the Indian population including those who worship the rivers do not think twice before polluting a river. Urbanization, industrialization, excess withdrawal of water, agricultural run-off, improper agricultural practices and various religious and social practices all contribute to river pollution in India. Every single river in India be it the Ganga, Yamuna, Cauvery or the Krishna have their own share of problems due to pollution. Waters from the Ganga and the Yamuna are drawn for irrigation through the network of canals as so

on as these rivers reach the plains reducing the amount of water that flows downstream. What flows in the river is water from small nalas, and streams that carry with them sewage and industrial effluents. The residual freshwater, is unable to dilute the pol-lutants and the rivers turn into stinking sewers. In spite of data from scientifically competent studies conducted by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), the Government has not been able to tackle this issue. Sewage and municipal effluents account for 75% of the pollution load in rivers while the remaining 25% is from industrial effluents and non-point pollution sources. In 1985, India launched the Ganga Action plan (GAP) the largest ever river clean-up operation in the country. The plan has been criticized for, overspending and slow progress. The GAP Phase II in 1991 included cleaning operations for the tributaries of the Ganga, ie; the Yamuna, Gomti and the Damodar. Thus the Yamuna Action Plan (YAP), Gomti Action Plan and the Damodar Action plan were added. In 1995 the National River Conservation plan was launched. Under this all the rivers in India were taken up for clean-up operations. In most of these plans, attempts have been made to tap drains, divert sewage to sewage treatment plants before letting out the sewage into the rivers. The biggest drawback of these river cleaning programs was that they failed to pin responsibilities as to who would pay for running the treatment facilities in the long run. With the power supply being erratic and these plants being heavily dependent on power, most of these facilities lie underutilized.

Moreover the problem of river pollution due to agricultural runoff has not been addressed in these programs. NRCP is scheduled to be completed by March 2005. The approved cost for the plan is Rs. 772.08 crores covering 18 rivers in 10 states including 46 towns. The cost is borne entirely by the Central Government and the Ministry of Environment and Forests is the nodal agency that co-ordinates and monitors the plan. Under this plan the major activities include treating the pollution load from sewer systems of towns and cities, setting up of Sewage treatment plants, electric crematoria, low cost sanitation facilities Control measures for preventing water pollution While the foremost necessity is prevention, setting up effluent treatment plants and treating waste through these can reduce the pollution load in the recipient water. The treated effluent can be reused for either gardening or cooling purposes wherever possible.

A few years ago a new technology called the Root Zone Process has been developed by Thermax. This system involves running contaminated water through the root zones of specially designed reed beds. The reeds, which are essentially wetland plants have the capacity to absorb oxygen from the surrounding air through their stomatal openings. The oxygen is pushed through the porous stem of the reeds into the hollow roots where it enters the root zone and creates conditions suitable for the growth of numerous bacteria and fungi. These micro-organisms oxidize impurities in the wastewaters, so that the water which finally comes out is clean.